Compliance documentation tells you what your policies are. Runtime enforcement is what stops an employee from accidentally pasting sensitive technical data into a public LLM. Containment.AI sits at the point of use — today via the shipping AI Chat Firewall browser extension and Agent Governance layer, with the High-Assurance Gateway available to design partners — and is built to block the action in real time. (Pre-ATO; no production deployments yet.)
Compliance platforms certify what your written policy says. They do not intercept, block, or log employee ChatGPT and Copilot sessions in real time. That's a different layer — and it's the layer that actually stops data loss.
Necessary. Not sufficient. A signed policy doesn't stop a paste.
Enforcement happens at the keystroke, not at the audit.
When an employee accidentally pastes export-controlled technical data into ChatGPT, a compliance audit report doesn't help.
Containment.AI's proxy blocks the submission.
ITAR and EAR-controlled technical data crosses LLM boundaries the same way any other data does — pasted into a chat window, attached to a prompt, dropped into a Copilot session. Documentation tells you that's against policy. Our proxy stops the submission before the data leaves.
Three enforcement points across the AI lifecycle, all designed around cross-domain technology — building toward formal verification (not yet attested) — against NSA cross-domain standards.
Chrome extension that inspects employee prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot in real time. Blocks export-controlled, ITAR/EAR-flagged, and policy-violating submissions before they leave the endpoint.
Deterministic guardrails that intercept autonomous agent actions before execution. Pre-execution evaluation against your policy — no probabilistic fallbacks, no LLM-judging-LLM.
AI cross-domain solution designed against NSA cross-domain standards. One-way data diodes, protocol breaks, and parsers designed for formal verification (in progress) — designed for the mission-critical end of the defense stack.
Containment.AI is not a substitute for FedRAMP authorization, and we do not claim FedRAMP authorization on this page. Compliance platforms operate at the documentation and authorization layer. We operate at the runtime enforcement layer. The two are complementary.
Our underlying cross-domain technology is designed against NSA cross-domain standards, and we are building the parsing path toward formal verification (verification in progress, not yet attested). Our compliance roadmap — SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP — is detailed on our compliance page. Containment.AI is also aligned with AARM v1.0 — the Cloud Security Alliance runtime-governance specification for autonomous AI agents — a credibility signal for DoD and NatSec buyers evaluating agentic-AI risk.
A 30-minute briefing. We'll show the proxy intercepting an export-controlled paste in real time, on a live browser, with the audit log written before the user even hits enter — and walk through the design-partner pilot.
We are onboarding a small number of NatSec and defense design partners on a fixed-scope, 90-day paid pilot ($25–50k, up to 50 seats, fee credited toward a year-one Enterprise contract). See the design-partner tier for details.
Or email enterprise@containment.ai directly.